Site icon AJKD Blog

SPRINT Arrives in the Canadian Hypertension World: The 2016 CHEP Guidelines

The big hypertension, and even nephrology, story of 2015 was the release of the SPRINT trial. The Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) trial compared an intensive systolic blood pressure (BP) target of 120 mm Hg to a standard target of 140 mm Hg in patients at high cardiovascular risk. It was halted early after interim analyses showed a significant decrease in cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality in the intensive arm.  Though there has been fierce discussion of where we go from here given that the prevailing trend of softening BP targets (eg, JNC 2014 recommended a target of 140 mm Hg for most and 150 mm Hg for elderly, ESH/ESC recommended 140 mm Hg for everyone), the early release of SPRINT results has not been accompanied by a similar change in treatment guidelines. The exception is the Canadian Hypertension Education Program (CHEP) guidelines, which are updated annually (see previous blog coverage here).

  CHEP 2015 JNC 8 ESH/ESC 2013 KDIGO 2012
Non-proteinuric CKD 140/90 140/90 140/90 140/90
Proteinuric CKD 140/90 140/90 140/90 130/80
Diabetic, non proteinuric CKD 130/80 140/90 140/90 140/90
Diabetic, proteinuric CKD 130/80 140/90 140/90 130/80
Elderly 150/901 150/902 140/90 Individualized tailored treatment

Table 1: The state of hypertension guidelines pre-SPRINT (numbers refer to blood pressure target in mm Hg)

1 Elderly defined as > 80 years age, non-diabetic, with no CKD

2 Elderly defined as > 60 years age

At the Canadian Hypertension Congress, CHEP updated the guidelines, but following the release of SPRINT findings, an additional expedited review was conducted to incorporate its findings in the 2016 recommendations.  To recap, there were three new recommendations for diagnosis:

For treatment, the one new recommendation so far had been to consider an increase in dietary potassium as a means to lower blood pressure (see our coverage from #KidneyWk for why that makes sense). Furthermore, the expedited review of the SPRINT findings have resulted in an additional treatment recommendation:

For high-risk patients, aged ≥50 years, with systolic BP levels ≥ 130 mmHg, intensive management to target a systolic BP ≤ 120 mmHg should be considered. Intensive management should be guided by AOBP.  Patient selection for intensive management is recommended and caution should be taken in certain high-risk groups.

What is considered high risk? At least one of:

Patients with one or more clinical indications should consent to intensive management. In addition, CHEP suggests caution in certain groups:

Limited or No Evidence 

Inconclusive evidence

Contraindications

  CHEP 2015 JNC 8 ESH/ESC 2013 KDIGO 2012
Non-proteinuric CKD 140/90 140/90 140/90 140/90
Proteinuric CKD 140/90 140/90 140/90 130/80
Diabetic, non proteinuric CKD 130/80 140/90 140/90 140/90
Diabetic, proteinuric CKD 130/80 140/90 140/90 130/80
Elderly 150/901 150/902 140/90 Individualized tailored treatment
Select high risk patients3 SBP 120      

Table 2: The state of hypertension guidelines post-SPRINT (numbers refer to blood pressure target in mm Hg) so far

1 Elderly defined as > 80 years age, non-diabetic, with no CKD

2 Elderly defined as > 60 years age

3 See text for definition of high risk, and patient populations in whom caution is suggested

The full paper is available here, and details and educational material will soon be available at the Hypertension Canada website.

Dr. Swapnil Hiremath
AJKD Blog Contributor

Disclosure: SH is a member of the task force for the Canadian Hypertension Education Programme. The opinions expressed here are that of the author, and do not represent the CHEP guidelines or process.

 

Exit mobile version