Why Do Diabetic Patients with CKD Die?

The association between chronic kidney disease (CKD) and cardiovascular events and death was first promoted by Alan Go over a decade ago. Since then, this association has been well established, and the relation between CKD and cardiovascular outcomes is now accepted as robust. In recent years, proteinuria has also emerged as an effect modifier in the relationship between decreased kidney function and clinical outcomes, and led to the KDIGO CKD Staging and Classification System, which includes not just reduced GFR but level of proteinuria as well. In a new report published in AJKD, the investigators of the TREAT trial report on the specific causes of mortality (cardiovascular and otherwise) and the relationship with both GFR and proteinuria.

The TREAT trial included patients with type 2 diabetes, a GFR between 20 and 60 mL/min/1.73m2 , and anemia who were randomized to receive darbepoietin alfa versus placebo. The main outcomes, death, cardiovascular events, or renal event, were disappointingly negative. The advantage of having a prospective trial, however, is that all the events were captured and adjudicated, providing rich, granular information about what actually happened. To further exemplify this, cardiovascular causes of death were adjudicated to be myocardial infarction, pump failure, sudden death, presumed sudden death, presumed cardiovascular death, fatal stroke, cardiovascular procedure related, pulmonary embolism, other CV deaths, or unknown. This is important, since a not insignificant proportion of sudden (presumed cardiac) death may be actually due to stroke. For example, a study from Japan (where autopsy rates are much higher than in North America) reported stroke to be almost equal to cardiac causes of sudden unexpected deaths. As a reminder, one of the few “significant” results from the original TREAT trial was an increase in stroke with darbepoietin alfa (HR 1.9, 95% CI 1.4, 2.7).

So, what so these data add? There is an increase in fatal stroke, sudden death, renal death, and infectious mortality in both treatment and placebo arms, though the respective proportions (of cardiovascular versus non-cardiovascular death) remain relatively unremarkable. The exception was an increase in the proportion of infectious mortality seen with lower GFR. The reported increase in infectious mortality in this population is a novel finding, as is the specific causes of cardiovascular death (stroke and sudden death – not fatal myocardial infarction) which account for the increase in cardiovascular deaths. There is also some more intriguing data – amongst those who start dialysis, infectious mortality keeps climbing, with the result that non-cardiovascular causes are responsible for more deaths than cardiovascular.

Overall, despite our frustration with negative trials, the data generated from many of these (just see the MDRD trial publications) has allowed us to gain a deeper understanding and evolve our thinking. In this case, the authors suggest a greater focus on exploring the reasons behind the higher risk of infections and designing interventions to reduce them.

Dr. Swapnil Hiremath
AJKD Blog Contributor

To view the article abstract or full-text (subscription required), please visit AJKD.org.

 

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s